Entries; AboutMe; Tagboard; Links;

{

}

plusquelavie;

Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox. 1280 x 800 :D

Got some free time today since tomorrow's study day. Mugging like mad these few days because Prelims start next week. I think I'm so screwed. I totally don't feel prepared, so I think I'm gonna have to settle for mediocre grades. Then start pia-ing like no tomorrow after Prelims. Hais. So no life. -_-

First day of night study. Quite productive for me, I must say. AND I MANAGED TO SOLVE A QUITE HARD MATHS QUESTION AFTER NOT TOUCHING MATHS FOR QUITE LONG. I'm feeling proud of myself. XD And I super feel like doing maths now. HAHA, but it's kinda late. And I'm abit sleepy. Shall save it for tomorrow then. 20+ days to Prelims. ARGH, must start pia-ing like no tomorrow!

Off to do abit more slacking then sleep. XD

The blogskin is pretty much done. Just that I have no idea what to put in the scrolling marquee to the side. Any suggestions?

And please comment on my blogskin! XD

Tomorrow is National Day celebrations~ YAY, slack day for once. :D

Must admit, Kaili's blog title is inspiring. So yes, when specifics fail, I get random.

Was thinking before going to bed last night. Exactly how do people come up with their theories on life? How does one exactly do deep thinking, or even think in general. I understand thinking when it comes to studies and calculations, but about life in general? I just don't get how people can think about 1 topic and expand from there. My thoughts generally move about things that have happened and things that I know, while 'deep thinkers' think in an outward fashion, as in linking from 1 small subject that caught their attention and spiral outwards, towards the unknown. So they come up with theories about how things happen.

Maybe it's the way certain brains function, and those 'deep thinkers' are generally going to be famous and successful in life. Look at Einstein, Newton; they think and think. And they come up with their laws. That's even more complex. Coming up with theories is one thing, finding proof FOR the theories is on a whole another level. So if thinking happens in stages, I'd be on stage 1 (no deep thinking whatsoever), and those theory makers would be stage 2, and the theory makers and actually can prove their theories would be stage 3. Who knows who will form the stage 4 and 5 and so on.

Maybe my brain is not that type. So I have to subject myself to being stupid? Seriously, Einstein is considered a genius, and everyone knows that. So if judging by the stages, he'd be a genius, stage 2-s would be considered smart, and stage 1-s would be average? Which person would settle for average? And yet you can't change how each brain works, so what happens now? Is that the cap on how smart a person can be? That wouldn't be fair would it? And so the saying goes: Life is never fair.

Great, so I'd have to settle for being average. And I don't want to. Pfft.

I don't do deep thinking, and my thoughts are hardly positive. Doubt anyone wants to read this wordy post anywaaaaay. Off to do my work. 8 Geog essay outlines, GAH. And Phys CA tomorrow. That's the best.

I'm supposed to be doing my NYJC P3 for Chem, and yet I'm blogging. HAHA. Oh well, edited the entries part. Decided the colours fit my theme quite well so left it. Might make them darker in the future or something. Can't really be bothered to mess around with colours right now. OHWELLLLL, CHEM TIME, and off to sleep. Good night people (whoever's reading my blog).

HEHEHEHE, just redid my whole layout. Coded it today. XD It's not done, especially the entries part, gonna redo the colour scheme. And the part that says hello. Gonna add a header in too. Maybe after my Geog? See how XD HAPPYZ.

Got some free time today since tomorrow's study day. Mugging like mad these few days because Prelims start next week. I think I'm so screwed. I totally don't feel prepared, so I think I'm gonna have to settle for mediocre grades. Then start pia-ing like no tomorrow after Prelims. Hais. So no life. -_-


First day of night study. Quite productive for me, I must say. AND I MANAGED TO SOLVE A QUITE HARD MATHS QUESTION AFTER NOT TOUCHING MATHS FOR QUITE LONG. I'm feeling proud of myself. XD And I super feel like doing maths now. HAHA, but it's kinda late. And I'm abit sleepy. Shall save it for tomorrow then. 20+ days to Prelims. ARGH, must start pia-ing like no tomorrow!

Off to do abit more slacking then sleep. XD


The blogskin is pretty much done. Just that I have no idea what to put in the scrolling marquee to the side. Any suggestions?

And please comment on my blogskin! XD

Tomorrow is National Day celebrations~ YAY, slack day for once. :D


Must admit, Kaili's blog title is inspiring. So yes, when specifics fail, I get random.

Was thinking before going to bed last night. Exactly how do people come up with their theories on life? How does one exactly do deep thinking, or even think in general. I understand thinking when it comes to studies and calculations, but about life in general? I just don't get how people can think about 1 topic and expand from there. My thoughts generally move about things that have happened and things that I know, while 'deep thinkers' think in an outward fashion, as in linking from 1 small subject that caught their attention and spiral outwards, towards the unknown. So they come up with theories about how things happen.

Maybe it's the way certain brains function, and those 'deep thinkers' are generally going to be famous and successful in life. Look at Einstein, Newton; they think and think. And they come up with their laws. That's even more complex. Coming up with theories is one thing, finding proof FOR the theories is on a whole another level. So if thinking happens in stages, I'd be on stage 1 (no deep thinking whatsoever), and those theory makers would be stage 2, and the theory makers and actually can prove their theories would be stage 3. Who knows who will form the stage 4 and 5 and so on.

Maybe my brain is not that type. So I have to subject myself to being stupid? Seriously, Einstein is considered a genius, and everyone knows that. So if judging by the stages, he'd be a genius, stage 2-s would be considered smart, and stage 1-s would be average? Which person would settle for average? And yet you can't change how each brain works, so what happens now? Is that the cap on how smart a person can be? That wouldn't be fair would it? And so the saying goes: Life is never fair.

Great, so I'd have to settle for being average. And I don't want to. Pfft.

I don't do deep thinking, and my thoughts are hardly positive. Doubt anyone wants to read this wordy post anywaaaaay. Off to do my work. 8 Geog essay outlines, GAH. And Phys CA tomorrow. That's the best.


I'm supposed to be doing my NYJC P3 for Chem, and yet I'm blogging. HAHA. Oh well, edited the entries part. Decided the colours fit my theme quite well so left it. Might make them darker in the future or something. Can't really be bothered to mess around with colours right now. OHWELLLLL, CHEM TIME, and off to sleep. Good night people (whoever's reading my blog).


HEHEHEHE, just redid my whole layout. Coded it today. XD It's not done, especially the entries part, gonna redo the colour scheme. And the part that says hello. Gonna add a header in too. Maybe after my Geog? See how XD HAPPYZ.